17th Geneva Forum – Palais des Nations (UN), Geneva – Monday, 8 December 2025
10th Annual International Conference on Philanthropy and Impact Investments for Peace and Development;
Impact finance and partnership opportunities: transdisciplinary projects, new sources of funding to address the objectives of the United Nations and non-governmental organizations.
Gathered at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, participants – project leaders, philanthropy practitioners, investors, businesses, actors from International Geneva, and partners – shared a common observation: systemic challenges require cross-sector (inter-silo) projects, sound economic models, and a common language of impact that can make projects understandable, comparable, fundable, and manageable over time.
The session confirmed that Geneva retains a unique capacity to connect diplomacy, finance, innovation, and field action. This connection must now translate into implementation mechanisms: replicable methods, partnership coalitions, field-based evidence, and verifiable impact trajectories.
When evidence becomes shareable, financing becomes possible. When partnership becomes operational, impact scales up.
NB: Two other statements are published separately, one regarding the alignment of International Geneva with Impact Finance, and the other specific to the Dry Run of the AGILE tool.
To read all the content, log in to the website for free.
|
General Observations from the Presentations
The five general presentations on impact finance that preceded the rest of the afternoon (see other statements) converged on one central point: impact finance works when it finances entire systems, not isolated actions.
- Truly fundable projects combine:
- a territorial logic (ecosystems, inhabitants, uses, risks),
- an evidence-based logic (data, traceability, verification, monitoring),
- a governance logic (rights, responsibilities, oversight, accountability),
- an economic model logic (real costs, sustainability, mission alignment).
- Scaling up depends less on “ideas” than on the ability to secure trust:
- ecological trust (biodiversity, resilience, long-term effects),
- scientific trust (protocols, data quality),
- financial trust (transparency, leakage reduction, accountability),
- operational trust (field evidence, results tracking).
Presentation Proceedings
| ● Thé |
To read all the content, log in to the website for free.
|